Second Place Winner
1999 Literati Contest
"Making God Swallow His Laughter"
A NEW PERSPECTIVE OF THE GOALS OF
L. RON HUBBARD, THE MAN
by Scott Mayer
Introduction
In the pages of a little-known interview with an anonymous
person, who allegedly read the manuscripts of the
legendary "Excalibur", by Lafayette Ron Hubbard, taken
circa December, 1985, there are revealed some interesting
thoughts, allegedly originated by L. Ron, which I believe
are keys to understanding the true intentions of the
person Scientologists throughout the world consider
"Source" for the only technology of the mind they consider
capable of freeing their immortal soul and uplifting them
to the status of superior human beings with god-like
spiritually generated powers.
These viewpoints bear no relationship whatsoever to the
Dorian interviews, or the work on closed electronic
biological circuits and the effects of the e-meter, other
than to set forth a hypothesis as to why these things
apparently occurred. As Hubbard, or Dorian through
Hubbard, said in Logic 15. The introduction of an
arbitrary into a problem or solution invites the further
introduction of arbitraries into problems and solutions.
I think that lies about the way things really are can be
considered to be arbitraries. They can be something on
the order of: Well, if there is really no god or creator,
and the wondrousness of infinitely unfolding universes are
merely the result of a chaotic cosmic fart. Then we can
do or say anything we want, so long as we're smart enough
to get away with it. So we justify lying, and then we
need more and more lies to cover the first one and since
the first snake potion killed a few people, inadvertently,
of course, we add a few things to it to reduce the
effects, etc., etc., etc, ad adsurdum.
That Scientology claims that Mr. Hubbard was a brilliant
man, and a prolific writer has never, to my knowledge been
actively disputed. Whether he was a brilliant criminal,
or humanitarian is what remains arguendo. As late as
1994, even a critic with the Washington Post, described
him as brilliant. Although, many attack Mr. Hubbard's
character with accusations that he was a psychotic
con-man, such attempts to stereotype him, and literary
critic's caustic remarks as to the quality of his "science
fiction" works, do little to disguise the fact that he
was, indeed a brilliant person and prolific writer and
came very close to buffaloing an entire world..
There is, however, little mention of what drove Hubbard to
do the things he did, and to what end his greatest story
ever, the creation of Dianetics and Scientology were
intended. The following excerpts from the above-mentioned
interview regarding the Excalibur Manuscripts, may indeed
provide us with insight into the inner workings of a mind
capable of creating so many volumes of literature
regarding the salvation of souls and creation of
super-beings on Planet Earth with, I might add, so little
scientifically demonstrable results.
THE EXCERPTS
Excerpts from an interview of a person who purportedly
actually read the entirety of L. Ron Hubbard's
"EXCALIBUR", in 1984 recently came into my possession.
The excerpts were so startling to me that I agreed to
enter this contest because I felt that some new light
could be shed about Mr. Hubbard's real intentions towards
the human race, and serve to take some of the mystery out
of what Hubbard's "Tech" was designed to accomplish In
Actuality, as opposed to the Reality submitted by
adherents to the cult.
The first excerpt that drew my attention was allegedly a
quote by Mr. Hubbard: "FEAR--NO FEAR, TWO STATES, YOU ARE
EITHER IN OR OUT". Interesting, especially in relation to
the "Emotional Tone Scale" One might also wonder where
the missing tone scale item "LOVE" would fall in relation
to fear and no fear. Is love merely an aspect of
"Serenity of Beingness?" Could one experience serenity of
beingness without also engaging in the act of
unconditional love? Points to ponder! Hold those
thoughts as we explore such matters in relation to being
in fear or out of fear. Could Diane tics and Scientology
have been attempts by Hubbard to conquer fear? Serenity
implies total peace with not only one's self, but with all
that is, which, of course, would be the creator (or "true"
source) of all-that-is. It would seem that "freedom from"
implies an opposite polarity of "freedom to." Would that
be freedom from fear? Accompanied therewith by "Serenity
of Beingness and unconditional love, which would certainly
be higher than conditional love on an arbitrary scale of
awareness. Doesn't conditional imply an exchange? What
need for an exchange, unless there is a fear of not
receiving mutual consideration in the giving and receiving
of Love? Wait a minute! isn't there an "Axiom" that
relates to this? Let's see, No, its one of the original
"Factors", Factor No. 29, from Scientology 08 "The book of
basics. p. 24, on "Havingness". "In life experience,
matter becomes havingness." "Observation" "To a thetan,
ANYTHING is better than nothing." Later, this early axiom
evolved into the Factors and Axioms of Scientology. We
hear in the recording the late Yvonne Gillham produced for
Ron Hubbard, the following:
"In the opinion of the viewpoint, any beingness, any thing
is better than no thing, any effect is better than no
effect, any universe better than no universe, any particle
better than no particle, but the particle of admiration is
best of all."
Yvonne, the actual founder of Scientology's "Celebrity
Center" was one of the most loving, peaceful, gentle,
spiritually aware, person I have ever known in my life.
Her character alone, spoke volumes of what an enlightened
mind was capable of manifesting in the form of
unconditional love and compassion for the human race. Her
instant acknowledgment of the beingness of the person
approaching her with a communication seemed to me to be
the epitome of what Hubbard was described in the matters
covered in the basic communications course. A person just
knew that if they could duplicate Yvonne's manner in
dealing with people that they would have mastered the art
of communication. Strangely, I never experienced that
feeling with Mr. Hubbard. My impression in both written
and personal communication with him was that that all he
was interested in was being acknowledged as "Source'" and
worshipped by you. His personal communications never,
ever left me with that warm, wondrous "feeling" inside
that I experienced with Yvonne. That feeling that here
was a being that truly loved all of mankind. I wonder if
Hubbard really knew the value of Yvonne. It was
impossible to stand in Yvonne's aura without knowing that
if a person of this character could support the teachings
of L. Ron Hubbard, then you, despite any nagging
questions, knew that you were indeed on the right track
toward spiritual fulfillment. So reader, If Affinity,
obviously a component of "Love", is the most valued
particle of all, implying action and activity exchanged by
and between thetans, why is it strangely absent from the
Emotional Tone Scale? Why is it not ever pursued in a
discourse on components of "Serenity of Beingness, or
discourses on the 2nd dynamic, or the importance of loving
and the practice of unconditional love in Third Dynamic
Groups, or as part of the Sixth Dynamic, Survival as a
Spirit? Wouldn't it seem that if the MOST VALUED particle
in the physical universe, being "Affinity" would be the
part and parcel subject of the process of enlightening
oneself from "Homo Novis" (ordinary man), to "Homo
Superior" wouldn't one's education include not only the
importance of loving, but the technical balance between
superior ability and living an ethical life? Do we just
not possess enough data at this point to explain the
strange absence of these issues from "Standard Tech" as
issued by "Source". How indeed, does fear and no fear
relate to one's ability to love unconditionally?
Frankly, I'm a three time loser in the marriage
department. I can tell you now, with utmost certainty,
how not to have a marriage work. And I can tell you with
total certainty that nothing I learned in Scientology ever
taught me how to be a good husband and create a wonderful
marriage. I place absolutely no blame on any of my three
wives. Were they each as clear about life, livingness and
loving as I was ignorant, they each in their own hearts
know where I went wrong. I, although mistakenly, believed
that in listening to Mr. Hubbard's "greatest challenge"
tape, that I could learn how to unconditionally love
others, in spite of reasons not to. It never occurred to
me that such knowledge would not be part and parcel of
becoming an OT. That promise was never realized during my
tenure in Scientology. What I have since learned has been
through coming to an understanding of my personal
relationship with the father/creator and the teachings of
his son, Yashua, or Jesus, the Christ, as popular
Christianity speaks of him (Which, of course, is as a
subject, in itself, worthy of further analysis if one is
to come to realistic terms with one's own spirituality.
We're it true that Hubbard's teaching's were able to
resolve difficulties with unconditional love, I believe
that not only would Yvonne Gillham be alive today, but the
rift between David Miscavige's mother law and my personal
friend, Flo Barnett, would not have resulted in her
shooting herself five times in the chest with a shotgun on
the eve of confessing crimes allegedly committed by David
Miscavige and his minions to the authorities. What
discipline she must have had to have been able to pull the
trigger on a shotgun 5 times into her own chest, while
obviously not flat on OT III. (Freedom from overwhelm).
Are we really so sure that Scientology processing is
complete? If the road to clear and OT and OT VIII
demonstrate results that lead to suicides by parishioners
in not just a few, but in cases which exceed hundreds?
Where in Dianetic or Scientology processing has the
concept of unconditional loving gone so far a-field as to
bring the every day parishioner to accept the excuse that
nothing within the boundaries of medical standards of
care, were necessary obligations of the Church to carry
out, because it was obviously the fault of the parishioner
that they had pulled in life threatening illnesses and
really wanted an "EOC" (End of Cycle) from responsibility
to their current "meat bodies".
Can the reader even imagine what would occur in the
medical fields practiced by mere "WOGS" should a doctor
turn his back on a patient, shrug his shoulders and state:
"its their own fault, they pulled it in, it's their Karma.
Why should I waste my time trying to help someone who
obviously is not responsible enough to get the proper
auditing to take care of this?'
I just cannot see Sally Chaleff, another jewel of a
person, who was allowed to die without treatment for her
cancer, nor Phoebe Mauer, nor Christopher Penny, nor Ed
Brewer or Lisa McPherson, any of these persons
deliberately ending cycle by refusing medical treatment.
It is obvious that those who could have intervened,
didn't, because they were numbed by their beliefs in the
efficacy of Scientology treatment, to the suffering of
those who were obviously not in possession of the
abilities promised by Ron Hubbard and his Gradation Chart.
Perhaps I venture too close, by contest rules to preaching
against perceived immorality by Mr. Hubbard and his
adherents, and should that be the case I admit my upset at
a religion claiming to be a savior of mankind,
demonstrating such callousness at the end of a lifetime of
exceptionally loving people, under their care and
responsibility. The comments above, of course, must be
stimulating many questions in your own minds regarding
what you do or do not know about the subject of
Scientology. Unfortunately, a subject such as the
evaluation of the ethical efficacy of the tenants of the
Church of Scientology cannot be summarized in a 10,000
word essay, much as I would like to be able to do so, and
as much as it would be a wonderful tool for Mr. Minton in
his efforts to bring truth to humanity in general. I
sympathize, but, as enthusiastic as I am in pursuing the
goal to bring enlightenment and a safe passage to the
spiritual enlightenment and realm of spirituality and the
realization that personal ethics springs forth from the
recognition of the inseparability of ethics and true
spirituality, we are engaged in at least a lifetime's work
and I am unable to bring forth the miraculous answer to
every thing in this simple writing.
For now, perhaps we should put the such immediate
questions aside in our "bull pen" where LRH says you
should put things that are not completely resolved, so
that the file clerk can bring them up later, once there is
sufficient data to make a further determination, in favor
of examining additional data which may have a bearing on
determining a solution to all the issues raised by this
rhetoric.
In continuing on with our anonymous interviewee's
observations. It is mentioned that in a 1938 letter to
"SKIPPER," the following quote is attributed to L. Ron
Hubbard.
"Foolishly perhaps, but determined none the less, I have
high hopes of SMASHING MY NAME INTO HISTORY SO VIOLENTLY
THAT IT WILL TAKE A LEGENDARY FORM EVEN IF ALL THE BOOKS
ARE DESTROYED. ['My caps' -- emphasis (bold) added]. That
goal is the real goal as far as I'm concerned. Things
which stand too consistently in its way make me nervous.
It's a pretty big job (Mission?). In a hundred years
Roosevelt will have been forgotten - which gives some idea
of the magnitude of the attempt."
Fascinating! "SMASHING MY NAME INTO HISTORY". As if
smashing is not enough violence.
As I recall from one of LRH's early tapes, isn't violence
a last resort? Much less,. . . "SO VIOLENTLY THAT IT WILL
TAKE A LEGENDARY FORM EVEN IF ALL THE BOOKS ARE
DESTROYED." Isn't such a statement the result of a fear
that it is the only way that one can be right? Did
Hubbard so fear that humanity would not recognize him and
his brilliance that he would "violently" stamp such
recognition into existence, even if all of his books were
destroyed? To paraphrase, I believe Hubbard's own example
of that type of thinking from an early tape I listened to
in relation to mankind was: . . "stamped on every club,
rock, knife, sword, bullet, bomb and rocket" throughout
the agonizing history of the human race, was stamped the
phrase "I'M RIGHT?".
Now, aside from the fact that somehow, the author has to
come up with 10,000 words for this contest, it should be
becoming obvious to the reader that the author is looking
at some things that were never examined during the initial
examination of the world according to Hubbard. So this is
all extemporaneous in nature. The intent here is not, as
required by contest rules, to lecture Scientologist, or
ex-Scientologists for that matter. In fact, as I write
this, I feel it is indeed impossible to effectively do
so. What I am hoping, is that when Scientologist go into
session, they will remember this discourse. What I am
hoping is that my questions and analysis will encourage
them to examine things not ordinarily touched on during
the "rudiments" of a session. I'm hoping, deep down
inside, that they will be willing to forego the electronic
bliss of floating a needle by agreeing with pre-conceived
session results and do some deep-seated agonizing as to
their personal desire to control the environment that the
rest of life will come to experience if they are allowed
by a quirk of fate, or process of L. Ron Hubbard to
control the destiny of others.
What I am finding most fascinating in writing this essay,
is that after so many years away from the influence of
Hubbard's "Church of Scientology", I am, in its writing,
at last examining issues which were not fully thought
through during my entire 10 years of subservience to the
dictates of the Church, without any thought to the effects
of personal gains sought for myself, in relation to the
effects of such gains on the rest of humanity. In
retrospect, my thanks to the creator that Mr. Hubbard
seems to have been more interested in his place in
history, than in being the purveyor of truth with regards
to the creation of a new species of mankind. Were
Hubbard's assumptions and technical truths indeed
mankind's way. I know now in total certainty that I was
certainly not responsible enough to have become "AT CAUSE
OVER MATTER, ENERGY, SPACE AND TIME. The rest of you
should also be very relieved that neither myself or others
like me succeeded in truthfully attesting to the end
phenomena of any of the OT levels.
It is almost humorous that Arnaldo Lerma's statement that
if there were any OT's, we wouldn't be here is totally
spot on. Certainly anyone who disagreed with L. Ron
Hubbard and his truths would not be here. They would most
certainly have picked up the gun and performed R2-45 on
themselves.
With regard to definitions of the state of OT (Operating
Thetan) I want to quote to the reader passages, which have
just come into my possession, which precede the great book
and advertising campaign changes of the late 70's and the
early 80's. My how things must change when one abandon's
Hubbard's ideas of Fabianism in ships at sea, to come
ashore and run your operations from a fixed land base upon
which the lawyers can take shots at you.
I rarely speak of how my ex-wife, Rheva Bittleman and I
managed to leave the Apollo just prior to its entry into
Daytona Beach, Florida and the establishment of the Church
of Scientology International in Clearwater Florida, and
stay out on mission for some 18 plus months. I assure
you, it was no accident, but carefully planned on my
part. At the time, I was LRH's personal estates manager,
and but for the slip up of a GO Finance staff member, I
would probably have become embroiled with the
Miscavige/Starkey takeover operation of the Church of
Scientology and the Hubbard estates. This certain staff
member was so filled with his importance as a GO Finance
staff member, that during our dry-dock refurbishing of the
Apollo in Curacao, he couldn't resist showing off his
current project. It was a room below decks, which even I
as Ron's personal estates manager, knew about. It was a
massive invoice changing project preceding the arrival of
the sea org on shore. Mary Sue Hubbard was weary of life
at sea and had used the guardian's office to scuttle the
Sea Orgs fleet of ships financially. I was the last
probably the first and last fleet captain leaving Rigg's
Eckleberry to scuttle the Excalibur as the last U.S. Ship
in the Sea Org. There was a problem, however, in bringing
the Apollo into Daytona, Florida, financial records,
formerly unavailable to the United States Internal Revenue
Service, could now be easily seized for them by U.S.
Customs officials upon entry into United States coastal
waters. Whoops!
Therefore, every document from anywhere which could
possibly show enurement of funds from any of the Churches
of Scientology, through Operations Transport Corp. or
Operations Transport Services, Ltd. of Panama, to L. Ron
Hubbard or his family. Had to be either destroyed or
altered.
To you old timer Sea Org members, you will remember that
it was not until sometime after 1972 that the Guardians
Office forced all Sea Org members to sign contracts with
the Church of Scientology organization that they were
currently posted at. Prior to that, all Sea Org Members
were actually employees of either or both Operations
Transport Corp., Ltd. or Operations Transport Services,
Ltd.. Panamanian Corporations and personal offshore
holding companies of L. Ron Hubbard. Remember the Flag
Order by "Commodore Hubbard": which was a part of every
Sea Org Members "Basic Hat". Stories Told (emphasis
added)? According to this story, the acceptable truth
told all people putting forth queries of the business of
the Sea Org Ships, was that we were an international
consulting business, traveling the world over and
servicing the needs of our various clientele. The
story, of course was only true to the extent that our
clients were the various Churches and Missions of
Dianetics and Scientology. The truth was that Ron Hubbard
laundered the moneys gathered by Scientology International
and H.A.S.I. ("Hubbard Association of Scientologists,
International") through Operation Transport Corp. and/or
Operation Transport Services to that it would not appear
as though he was personally profiting from the activities
of the Religion of Scientology.
When Mary Sue scuttled the Sea Org's control of
Scientology by the "Commodore" through the use of
Operations Transport Corp. She also shot the hell out of
Stories Told, and create an enormous problem in keeping
the IRS from finding out about enurement of funds to
Hubbard and his family from the income of the various
Churches of Scientology around the world.
So, there I am, personally responsible for everything
that's going on aboard the Apollo, just married, and I
find out that the largest single fraud against the IRS in
history is underway aboard ship without any prior
knowledge on my part.
As will be discussed in further detail below, I was
already aware from my short time aboard, that Flag itself
was not the Great White Canoe in the sky that it was
promoted to be. Compared to my Flagship, the Excalibur,
it was a veritable garbage scow when I arrived at Flag to
assist then Director of Maritime Operations, Commander
Robert F. Young, in getting the Apollo cleaned up,
ship-shape (and unknown to me, ready for sale on arrival
in the U.S.). It was soon obvious to me that Commodore
Hubbard was not the superman the rest of the world thought
he was viz-a-vie his public relations departments around
the globe.
As I dined with my new wife Rheva aboard my personal
sailboat on the evening of my discovery of the invoice
changing project, I knew I had to get us off that ship, or
it was quite possible that my wife and I would be
honeymooning in jail as a result of an IRS raid on the
ship when it hit U.S. Waters.
I knew that Scientology and the Sea Organization would
never be the same again once the Flag Land base was opened.
It dawned on me that both my wife and I had a proven track
record as successful Sea Org Missionaries for Mr.
Hubbard. I took advantage of my wife's desire to see her
parents, who were pestering us to take a vacation and
visit them in Miami, and suggested that we go see Kerry
Gleason, who was then in charge of International Sea Org
Operations and see if there wasn't trouble with income
somewhere in the world which would be serious enough to
get him to use LRH Mission needs to get us pulled off post
and fired out to anywhere in the world but our jobs aboard
the Apollo. Rheva was excited at both the opportunity to
combine a mission with a trip to see her parents after we
completed the mission and were successfully debriefed and
had earned some time off and she cooperated with me in
handling Kerry.
Our Guardian Angeles were apparently with us, as Kerry had
troubles aplenty with gross income statistics and was
short of experienced staff to fire off on mission. We
were off the ship in less than 48 hours. Except for trips
back to Clearwater, Florida, the new Flag Land Base, every
few months for de-briefing and re-briefing, we stayed out
on mission as a husband and wife team for over 18 months,
with Power income raising statistics. Ron and the Sea Org
were of course very happy with our work because we made
lots of money, which the land base needed to buy up the
City of Clearwater and take over the community. We were
awarded time off after every mission to go to Miami and
see Rheva's mom and dad. It was those very missions,
which gave me the opportunity to see where your fees were
really spent and realize the enormity of the Scientology
criminal enterprise. The trip we made to South Africa was
my last mission for the Commodore before leaving the Sea
Org on a personal leave of absence.
I relayed the above, because it was the shift to land,
which was actually responsible for the change in all of
the Scientology promotional materials, and in particular,
changes to the original gradation chart. which we will
cover thoroughly in this essay, but here I want to point
out that the changes drastically altered what the Church
sold to new parishioners without disturbing the old
"hidden data line as to what OT's could and couldn't do.
Lawyers couldn't get us at sea if Scientology wasn't
producing the results it said it could. But NOW, on land,
they could subpoena us as we walked off the base.
While we will cover the other changes in the OT Levels and
the gradation chart more fully later, the biggie, OT VIII,
is the definition I want to give you here.
Now-a-days, of course, with the emphasis on protection of
"trade secrets" and copyrighted "sacred materials",
Scientology just tells you on its gradation chart that
your abilities gained will be those attained in completing
the materials of OT VIII. HOGWASH!!!. Here are the end
phenomena sold out of the textbooks in 1975 and earlier:
"OPERATING THETAN OT Course Section VIII at Advanced Orgs.
. . ABILITY TO BE AT CAUSE KNOWINGLY AND AT WILL OVER
THOUGHT. LIFE, FORM, MATTER, ENERGY, SPACE AND TIME,
SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE."
Think about it, ability to be at cause knowingly, and at
will. . . It is my hope that in analyzing the data found
herein, with respect to this definition and other data
which has recently come into my possession, we can,
together assist mankind in discovering the weaknesses in
our own character, which, in the past have drawn us all
towards Hubbard's "truths, and others like him.
I can recall, in reaching towards Scientology a very
strong desire to be able to love unconditionally always,
which, again, seems to go hand-in-hand with the concept of
"Serenity of Beingness". In that same light, doesn't
serenity of beingness imply or pre-suppose a relationship
with the creator of all-that-is that is almost a
partnership, or joint venture. I mean to say, doesn't it
strike you that if you operated in a state in which you
experienced the "End Phenomena" of: "Freedom from
Overwhelm" (OT III), or "Total Cause Over Matter, Energy,
Space and Time" (OT VIII) as a natural state of beingness,
that you would have demonstrated that you were responsible
enough to be trusted with such powers. Cliches aside, "My
God" where else would you acquire those powers?
Let's examine these concepts a bit more carefully than
usual, for it seems to me that when we look at the
"dictionary" definition of overwhelm, and the term "Total
Cause" over the physical universe, concepts with regard to
ethics, responsibility to all life forms, sentient or
otherwise (assuming that anyone can agree on a usable
definition of sentient), and how those life forms
"survive" in the face of beings capable of eradicating
such forms of life with a single thought. I fail to see
how a responsible "GOD", or creator "could bring into
being the myriad complex forms of existence and take the
chance on some human jerk, wiping out all such endeavors
with a single thought. I spent some 10 years as a high
level executive in Scientology, and NEVER came across such
a being with either such abilities or responsibility
level, including the founder himself.
I ask the reader to recall a basic "atheistic" claim, when
paraphrased, goes like: If there were a "god" he would
never permit the things that mankind perpetrates on
himself and other life forms in just this universe.
Yet originally L Ron Hubbard, and now his followers, would
have us believe that he, many levels above the need for
physical form, remains "Source" of the highest truths
known to mankind on the physical plane. Wouldn't you say
that if this were indeed true, then regardless of physical
body or not, he too, would have to bear such
responsibility for the "...."-ups of himself and his
followers? How, indeed, could he have departed the
"physical plane", berating David Miscavige for having
betrayed him and the Church. Does this sound like the
dialogue of a master of matter, energy, space and time?
It seems that much of the other research I have done over
the last twenty-some years points to the fact that not
only "Source", but the entire Church have been
demonstrating behavior which is akin to those un-flat on
Hubbard's Level 4 of the Gradation Chart. Un-flat
"Service Facsimiles, defined herein for the benefit of the
uninitiated as: mental machinery which us used by a being
to "make others wrong, in order to be right!" It was my
understanding from Ron's policies and bulletins that only
20% of mankind was truly suppressive. Of course the
number of jerks observable in the behavior of normal human
beings would seem to indicate that possibly the influence
of that 20% of human SP's caused behavior which is
depressing to most people, and possibly if Scientology
were able to eradicate the 2.5% of homosexuals Hubbard
called for in his efforts to cleanse the planet, the job
would be easier and of course, justified by their
interference with the goals and purposes of Scientology,
but to state that everyone who is not a Scientologist is
an enemy, seems to indicate that everyone who does not
convert to Scientology right now is an enemy, what does
that say for the efficacy of the processing? Isn't it
supposed to be axiomatic? That is, self-evidently true?
I'm sorry, but such thought seems to me to be saying that
there are only a select few that are not degraded to the
point that they can grasp Hubbard's vision, and that the
rest are degraded beings, lost souls, unworthy of
existence outside the goals of Scientology, and therefore
doomed to destruction for the good of those who have
converted to Scientology, i.e. the "Greatest Good" for the
greatest number of "Scientology's' dynamics.
Quite frankly, for a being who is 30-some levels above OT
VIII (Again, per the original Gradation Chart: "Total
Cause Over Matter, Energy, Space and Time") there seems to
be some unresolved problem in his monitoring of the
behavior of the Church of Scientology executive structure
towards no only life-long members, but in relation to
crimes consistently perpetrated against those who disagree
with Church ecclesiastical practices.
I find it greatly disturbing, that the current executive
structure, including but not limited to, David Miscavige,
Michael Rinder, Norman Starkey (whom for his length of
tenure in the Sea Organization should have been OT XXX5 by
now), find it necessary to resort to VIOLENCE, FRAUD,
DECEIT, and abuse of the United States Judicial System in
order to bring peace, tranquillity, and salvation of the
souls of the human race of this planet. Doesn't it seem
strange to anyone that OT VIII's and whatever could
possibly exist above, would have the need to live by a
Credo of "Never Fear to Hurt Another in a Just Cause". I
mean, surely David Miscavige must be at least an OT VIII
in order to be qualified to have absolute command over
every executive, staff member, and parishioner in any
organization having anything to do with the Church of
Scientology. Really! What could all of us supposedly
un-united WOGS of the planet do against the intentions of
"millions" of tried and true Scientologists around the
planet, united under several thousand OT VIII's, hundreds
of true OT VII's, even more thousands of OT III's. It
just doesn't make sense when one listens to the rhetoric.
As the greatest source in the history of mankind, would L.
Ron Hubbard, relinquished his peacetime post of
"Commodore" to any being who wasn't at least "Just below"
himself on the Know to Mystery Scale. After all, in the
Organizational Executive Course and Flag Executive
Briefing Course didn't Ron specifically state the
importance of tone scale position in hiring? Isn't it
true that he said that it was important that recruiters
and personnel directors be very highly trained and up the
bridge (paraphrase) because no personnel director or
recruiter would ever hire anyone higher on the Tone Scale
than him or herself???? How could the current Supreme
Commander of the Sea Organization David Miscavige, and the
entirety of Scientology, be an asthmatic, forced to live
in a desert environment, and yet be in possession of the
ability to be in TOTAL CONTROL OVER MATTER, ENERGY, SPACE
AND TIME.
Now I have spent quite some time around and about Michael
P. Pattinson, and while I am quite disinterested in his
current sexual persuasion, he has obviously not been cured
of his "ruin" while an attested OT III, and is obviously
not "Free from Overwhelm" as can be witnessed in his
depression over losing his court hearings against the
"Church", and, additionally, he is obviously not an OT
VIII, even though for years he was billed as Scientology's
highest trained and processed ambassador to the world.
Nor, is there any evidence whatsoever, in terms of the
original Gradation Charts "Abilities Gained" Section and
"End Phenomena" Sections, that anyone in any universe has
been produced by such levels of Scientology Technical
Processing. In fact, current NOTS "confidential
materials" are in direct contradiction with LRH
"Philadelphia Doctorate Course" materials, which to my
knowledge have never been revised by LRH or anyone else.
In one of the PDC tapes, LRH specifically states that OT's
are not audited to the state of OT (Because of course,
there is no reactive mind to audit), but they are
"Trained" to the state of OT. This would, of course,
pre-suppose that the basic mind given us by the true
source of mankind, which not even LRH has claimed to have
created as "Source", despite Gods screw-up in not
realizing he had also created a "reactive" mind, (caught,
thank "God" by Hubbard's brilliance) is capable, after
clearing, of being "Trained" to the state of "Operating
Thetan", including but not limited to, "Freedom from
Overwhelm", "Intentional Alteration of the "MEST" universe
(OT VII) and, while levels below what Scientology can
really produce, "TOTAL CONTROL OVER MATTER, ENERGY, SPACE
AND TIME".
Naturally, we would have to forgive the "WOGS" (Worthy
Oriental Gentlemen, or Meat Bodies to the initiates)
because they know not what they do and god has accepted no
responsibility for their actions. Excuse me, but what I
don't follow here is how God or the creator of all that
is, or Yahweh, or any of dozens of names for the creator,
could pass on the knowledge of the secrets of the universe
and the technology of dispensing them to humankind through
L. Ron Hubbard, without L. Ron Hubbard accepting some sort
of responsibility for the effects that he is creating on
the rest of life.
Regardless of this contest I would seriously like to hear
from the readers with regard to the points covered above.
No one has ever done even a partial analysis of the "Q's",
the logics, the Dianetic axioms, the Scientology axioms in
relation to the definitions contained within the
Scientology Dictionary of terms, and especially, in light
of the original gradation chart, copies of which seem to
be extremely difficult to locate. I would be happy to
respond to reader's comments and suggestions and even to
embark on further analysis of the above-referenced
subjects. Contact can be made through Citizens Against
Corruption, 6045 26th Road North, Arlington, Virginia
22207 (703) 241-1498, or by e-mail to alerma@dgs.dgsys.com
or retiredcap@hotmail.com.
Let's now put aside the concepts set forth above and delve
a little deeper into the anonymous interviewee's coverage
of the Excalibur Manuscripts, with an eye to bridging the
materials together in a new perspective of the true
intentions of L. Ron Hubbard and his Church of Scientology.
What exactly, was the Excalibur manuscript(s) about? Our
interviewee states that essentially the theme is to
"Survive". The manuscript describes how every aspect of
live can be traced back to survival. For example:
Cells = survival.
Family = survival
Groups = survival,
Etc., Etc. Since the manuscript was written circa 1938,
it appears that Survival was the precursor for the origin
of the eight dynamics.
It now seems, however, that the development of the eight
dynamics were based more on an escape from not only the
fear of being unable to survive in a universe created by a
fickle "God", but in an effort to personally prove that
such a god, had screwed up and was in need of being
informed that he had indeed, with the creation of
Mankind's physical universe, and that Hubbard was just the
sort of person to call it to his attention.
What is the basis for the above commentary? Consider
seriously the following allegations of our anonymous
interviewee allegedly quoting Mr. Hubbard.
"it's a big joke, this living. God was feeling sardonic
the day he create the universe. So its rather up to at
least one man ever few centuries to pop up and come just
as close TO MAKING HIM SWALLOW HIS LAUGHTER AS POSSIBLE."
Followed thereafter, by what is seemingly an out of
sequence comment:
"I'M THIRTY PERCENT SHOWMAN AFTER ALL BECAUSE I
INSTINCTIVELY DIVE TOWARD POPULAR HUZZAHS."
From the standpoint of the punctuation alone, it would
seem to be something that LRH would say.
What concerns me the most, however, is the implication
that the creation of the universe flew in the face of
Hubbard's personal opinion as to the way things should
have been; and, that it was his job to make the creator
wrong, without any indication of what, indeed, was in
Hubbard's opinion, actually wrong. In fact so wrong, in
fact, that humanity itself needed to give the creator a
poke in the right place to get him into the right
mindset. That mindset, I suspect, would probably mimic
the argument between God and Lucifer, which according to
most humankind lore, resulted in the situation in which we
find ourselves today. A world run by evil, incompetent to
serve the needs of a free mankind, an in need of a modern
day Messiah, to save it, as if Yashua was insufficient,
to miraculously undo god's mistakes and glow things right.
If Scientology is here to save you, hat, I ask, is it here
to save you from? If the creator of all that is has been
mistaken in his creative endeavors, and his actions
somehow failed to give mankind the very real freedom of
choosing between right and wrong, good and evil, love or
hate, as his means of leading us back to supporting a
personal lifestyle that brings a joy to living, regardless
of perceived obstacles towards known goals, then what
alternative does Hubbard and his Church of Scientology
offer us? My tenure in Scientology never demonstrated
that Hubbard's perceptions gave us any more perceived or
unperceived happiness than those suggested by Buddha,
Mohammed, Richard Bach, or Jesus, the Christ, or any other
prophet down through the ages. Am I just misperceiving
things, or is all of the suffering that has occurred
through the ages not been the result of mankind itself
refusing to live the lifestyles taught by such personages,
regardless of their deified personalities?
Are not the Ten Commandments ten ways in which to live a
better life, does anyone who possesses anything but a
criminally oriented mind seriously believe that they are
only the Ten Suggestions! ! ! ???? Do Buddha's rules for
right living suggest that they are only correct until you
feel the need to screw someone out of something that you
covet for yourself, because you are too lazy to exercise
the discipline necessary to acquire that thing for
yourself.
What rules for happy living has Hubbard's Scientology
philosophy laid out that are in any way more workable than
exercising all of the rules for happy living that have
been handed down throughout the ages.
A Japanese girl I know, who is a very intelligent,
competent and loving individual (and potential woman's
nine-ball pool champ) and I were discussing the subject of
ethics and billiards one day. She asked me why I insist
on calling all of my shots, rather than just the pocket
the object ball is to fall in. I told her that it was
because I wanted no doubt about whether it was me or
"luck" or "chance" or the "fates" that caused the ball to
go where I indicated. I told her that I loved pool because
it allowed me the opportunity to develop and demonstrate
the abilities my creator had given me. I told her that I
did not consider any form of cheating at pool to be
beneficial to me and my personal relationship with the
creator. She acknowledged my reasoning, but then said: "I
don't understand you Westerners. Why is it that you have
to be religious and believe in a god to be ethical"? To
paraphrase, she said that it seemed that in America, if
you are not religious, you are not considered to be an
ethical person. She said that in Japan, ethics are part
and parcel of one's educational courses while growing up.
Her statements stopped me short and I commented that it
was quite something for a person to see the benefits of
being ethical without having any personal communion with
one's creator. It had never occurred to me that this was
possible. In fact, I had never thought about it at all.
Could that be what is wrong with American society? Being
brought up to be ethical as a result of fear of reprisals
from one's God? Didn't Yashua preach the gospel (God's
Truth) to teach us right living, and that such living
would bring us closer to our creator. Imagine your
children growing up being able to personal discern
rightness from wrongness without need of fear of
punishment from any particular type of god or gods if they
somehow did not meet the often arbitrary and confusing
requirements of denominational sects. I had no idea that
Japanese children were brought up that way. It also
explains why in 1972, as then Executive Director of the
first Japanese Org, I had to make the unilateral decision
to close down that first mission into Japan. We were
simply unprepared to integrate Scientology principles into
a culture we were totally ignorant of. Years later, in
1984 surveys conducted by Scientology still agonized over
whether to drop the religious curtain veiling Scientology
operations to be conducted in Japan and instead
concentrate on the business techniques and philosophical
approach.
Tying ethics into the subject of in fear or out of fear
makes for a fascinating investigation. Didn't Hubbard use
fear of ethics handling to drive adherents into total
compliance with his edicts? Are not those same tactics
used today to accomplish similar thought control?
Personally, I worked for 10 years on Scientology's
behalf. During that time I broke a number of laws, lied
for Scientology, offered to kill for it, withheld
knowledge from lawful governmental agencies that
Scientology was not in compliance with rules and
regulations binding on all other citizens, caused
parishioners to be blackmailed into compliance with the
dictates of Hubbard's Guardian's office, in order to
increase the gross income of Scientology organizations
around the world, smuggled incredibly large sums of
money(in excess of $500,000 per week out of the City of
Los Angeles, California alone) to countries of
convenience, witnessed gross fraud against the Internal
Revenue Service of the United States, and suffered the
loss of loved ones, eliminated by the needs of the Church
in accomplishing its goals to take over of world
governments in order to save us from ourselves, etc.,
etc., ad adsurdum.
I realize now that during that entire time period I was
operating out of a fear that:
a. If I didn't make things go right for Hubbard, world
governments might collapse before I could become clear and
reach the coveted OT Levels.
b. As a senior executive I would bear a huge percentage of
contributory negligence for the failure of our mission to
save the planet and all of its souls. and;
c. I would never be forgiven by the creator for all of my
childhood and early adulthood sins and thus be consumed by
the wall of fire, whatever form of hell that was?
(Remember, the OT Levels were not at that time available
on the Internet, so none of us knew that they were
amalgamated science fiction stories garnered from
thousands of years of religious myths.)
The above considerations alone readily demonstrate the
extent to which a person can be controlled through fear to
work endlessly to accomplish an end that will keep the
person from an agonizing freefall through the rest of
eternity. But how one then asks does this relate to
Hubbard's flight from fear? Just what do we know so far
from the data observed herein?
Well first of all we can decipher that Hubbard held God
and life in apparent contempt.
Why else would people like him be deemed necessary to come
along every hundred years or so and make God swallow his
own joke. If indeed, Hubbard believed that God was a
screw up, that would explain his proven close association
with the late Satanist, Alexander Crowley, who like
Hubbard was apparently denied immortality on earth by one
of the two primary forces God, or his alter ego, the
Devil. Did Hubbard believe that evil was more powerful
than good? If not, why would one practice Witchcraft and
Satanism? I would also point out that isn't the practice
of satanic ritual a form of Propitiation? Kind of low on
the emotional tone scale isn't it? Crowley, aptly titled
"the Beast", expounded "Do what though whilst! Thus,
inferring mankind as separate and above any universal
morality or spiritual ethic. If we scan closer can't we
see under the veil of so-called justice, the gleam of
something evil peeking through the phrase "Never Fear to
Hurt Another in a Just Cause [emphasis added] whose
cause? A being who believes "Do what though Whilst!" to
be the only immutable law of universes.
And what need for such power as the states of OT described
to be possessed on earth by mere humankind. Was Hubbard
in truth at war with the Gods. Did he come to loath not
only God, but Satan as well, as the most adored being in
the universe (. . ."but the most valued particle of all is
admiration") and in his fear that his greatness would go
unrecognized by anyone, seek the power to unseat both
deities?
I wonder, were Hubbard to have in fact uncovered secrets
of the universe(s) which would place him on a combat level
with the gods, why indeed would he need the rest of the
human race as an army against the forces of evil afoot in
the universe. If the concepts of good and evil are
actually polarities of an arguable supreme beingness, what
the hell difference would the rest of us make to forces of
that magnitude.
One would think that were the OT Levels anywhere near
those advertised in the original gradation chart (Yes we
will examine that issue), there would be major preparation
of an initiate prior to the granting of such super-human
powers. For what if his minions, like Hubbard himself,
turned against even the supreme arrogance of Lucifer.?
Its almost as if Hubbard had assumed the role of cosmic
fence. Hey buddy, I've got a way to sell that bridge over
there in Brooklyn. You steal it for me and when I sell it,
I'll give you more money than you could ever work for in
your life.
It just boggles the mind that someone with such acclaimed
spiritual power wouldn't just call in his generals, tell
them flat out that he had other things to do, that Right
Hand was in charge, and that the left hand better support
him or he would come back and make them both wish they had
learned to get along with each other. Then stand up, step
out of his body, like old clothes left on the seashore and
walk off into infinity. Instead, "Source" whined that
David Miscavige had betrayed him and the rest of
Scientology and stolen his power, not to mention that
filthy lucre stuff (uggh!!, money).
For god's sake, the last time I talked to Hubbard was in
Curacao, Netherlands Antilles in 1974, on the quarter-deck
of the Apollo, he was shaking so bad it looked like he was
going to have an epileptic seizure, his speech was slurred
and practically unintelligible. I know he was trying to
tell me something about the clouds and the day's
photo-shoot, but he just couldn't manage to get it out. He
was just recovering from having a golf-ball sized cyst
removed from the middle of his forehead, which he hid from
everyone with his hats. Kima Douglas told me later that
she and Mary Sue forced him to get rid of it. Have you
ever read Andre Tabayoyan's Deflation in the Church of
Scientology v. Fishman/Geertz case? I mean I knew the old
man was bad off, but Andre was his butler, and between
what he and Kima say about Ron's medication, he was
practically popping pills like M & M's every day. I just
can't imagine what he must have been like six years
later. I imagine pathetic, for the founder of the
greatest techniques in the entire agonizing history of
mankind for physical and spiritual well being, the
Sciences of Dianetics and Scientology! Yet to this day
Miscavige and his boys maintain that they're cranking out
OT's just like Ron wanted them to, and continue to be sued
by people like Michael P. Pattinson, who paid them some
$500,000 over the course of a quarter of a century because
he just wanted to stop doing men. Miscavige, knowing full
well that Michael was un-flat on OT III, still gay, and
obviously a false attest on every OT Level above that,
through and including OT VIII and NOTS 34 (Which I
laughingly refer to as Not OT I through 34), and
fraudulently billed Michael to staff, parishioners and the
general public as the highest trained and processed
Scientologist on the planet.
Puleeze! Don't you have to start taking this OT stuff
with a saltshaker and lots of water?
THE GRADATION CHART
I think we are at the point where the "Original" Gradation
Chart becomes pertinent to a look at the development of
Dianetics and Scientology through the eyes of a man I
personally believe was driven by fears for not only his
personal survival, but also the survival of his image in
the eyes of the rest of mankind to come. While the
"original" definition of OT VIII was given earlier in
order that you come to see that Scientology and its vast
number of processes to handle every problem in getting
non-suppressive and PTS (Potential Trouble Source) persons
up the bridge, in all likelihood has never produced a
being capable of demonstrating the abilities gained and
end phenomena set forth above in the Clear and OT levels,
and even more likely, since recent data from the possibly
fictional character "Dorian, with regard to the effects of
auditing procedures, and recent discoveries with regard to
the phenomena manifested by submission of induced
electronic current through a persons body and its closed
electrical biological circuits suggests that the states of
clear and above are merely states induced by both auditing
techniques and the brainwashing and mind control
influences induced by excessive current flow through the
body by use of the e-meter. . Research, as described by
papers written by Arnaldo Lerma, suggest that clearing of
subjective whole-track difficulties experienced by a
person undergoing Dianetics and Scientology processing are
induced by the very processing the person is doing to rid
himself of problems, in order to attain the end phenomena
which Scientology apparently falsely proclaimed possible
under the "abilities gained" and "end phenomena sections
of the Gradation Chart itself. When Scientology exposed
itself to the law by coming ashore, in the mid-seventies,
it wasted little time in eradicating the old gradation
chart, yet it never instructed it staff and parishioners
that the old gradation chart was misrepresentative and
allowed old-timers to maintain the supposition that the
levels promoted by the old gradation chart were in fact
true and new initiates could expect too, to attain such
states of spiritual enhancement and personal power.,
The original definitions of OT Levels 1 through VII are
stated below first, because it is important to note that
after the relatively inexpensive states of Level O through
Clear have been attained, the being is allegedly at a
state which has previously been unattained by mankind, and
apparently, deliberately withheld from mankind due to a
screw up by god himself in the design of human beings, I
mean really, who else could you blame? More on this
precept at the end.
OT I: Extroverts a being and brings about an awareness of
himself as a thetan in relation to others and the physical
universe.
OT II : Ability to confront the whole track (Whose whole
track and Which Whole Track apparently deliberately
omitted)
OT III: Return of full self determination; freedom from
overwhelm (Said to handle the problems of homosexuality).
OT IV: Certainty of self as a being
OT V: Refamiliarizes a thetan exterior with the physical
universe (Freedom from introversion into MEST (matter,
energy, space & time).
OT VI: Ability to operate freely as a thetan exterior (In
what universe apparently deliberately omitted); and to act
pan-determinately extends the influence of the thetan to
the universe of others. (Mind Control at a distance?)
OT VII: Rehabilitation of intention, ability to project
intention (Lots of unanswered questions on this one).
WOW!! Has anyone ever seen anyone who could do these
things, I mean really, Hubbard himself, supposedly
thirty-some levels of OT above these abilities never
demonstrated anything close to such abilities. Why the
old gradation chart and the abilities gained up to the
state of clear alone could be the subject of another
10,000 word essay.
Following, are some comments with regard to my perception
as to they way that potential new members of the Church
are induced to continue up through the levels before the
final hook and reel-n are accomplished on the allegedly
upper levels and the parishioner says a final farewell to
his hard earned life-time savings.
In Scientology, programming begins with the introduction
of ARC, or affinity, reality and communications. catchy
words. They are, in my opinion the first cast of the fly
rod to the fish in the sea of potential new Scientologists.
Hubbard uses the affinity he is able to generate through
his almost hypnotic story telling, viz-a viz his taped
lectures and communications courses to get people into
agreement with trying out Scientology courses and
auditing. The communications course is the first step in
creating a psychological addition to Scientology
programming.
There is a difference between "Reality" and "Actuality".
Actuality is what is. If, as Hubbard claims, reality is
agreement, then as a former student of Black Magic,
reality becomes whatever he can convince people it is.
Once they have gone for the con, they simply do not see
anything outside the agreed upon parameters of the con.
So the con becomes totally real to the mark, but quite
probably has no relationship to the actuality of the rest
of life. Separation, divide and conquer. Ring a bell????
It is no accident that defining words is stressed so
highly in Scientology. The Scientology Dictionary as an
example (in which yours truly may be seen pictured within
the definition of "Third Dynamic"), of the creation of a
language which once learned, defines the reality of the
reader and practitioner, the world according to Hubbard.
The beauty of the con (from Hubbard and his heirs
viewpoint) is that once you have agreed to maintain the
purity of the tech, you must also continuously open your
wallet and shell out to obtain the benefits of the "Tech".
THE PROGRESSION OF THE CON
The con, of course, begins with the concept of a "Bridge"
itself. One has to first create the need to go over one,
and this is accomplished by the "Dissemination Drill" A
"ruin" is found on the mark. The ruin can be anything at
all, anything that the individual is willing to agree has
been ruining his life in some fashion. Once he agrees
that that something is ruining his life, it is but a
simple task to indicate to him that Scientology can handle
that and is hear to save him from his ruination. There is
no denial that Hubbard was indeed a brilliant individual,
his character, however, left all of us something to be
desired, and his intelligence was distorted by criminally
distorted intentions to violently leave his mark upon the
world and his willingness to harm others in his just cause.
I'm convinced that as a student of the late PT Barnum, he
was consciously aware that he couldn't just begin with
ripping people off for their money. That would, of
course, spoil any further opportunity to hit them up again.
Now in light of the recent "Dorian" interviews, Hubbard
may have indeed been duped into creating Scientology by
Dorian and his cohorts, but whether this is just Dorian's
own attempt at literary immortality or Hubbard was part of
the gang seems redundant in view of the great harm such
activities have done to those engaged in a serious attempt
to live a more spiritual existence.
What better way to keep the marks coming back than to hint
that his "Bridge" would restore the abilities lost by the
human race as a result of the activities of a long-dead
federation of planets. How brilliant to dangle the carrot
in front of the rabbit, with the rabbit constantly
pushing the carrot away from itself, through its agreement
with Hubbard's reality and a corresponding
misunderstanding of actuality?
The first three levels of the "Bridge" actually create a
self-imposed ARC with Scientology. The levels are
designed to create affinity through agreement and
communication. There is absolutely no doubt that the
Communication Course increases a person's ability to
communicate. As a Sea Organization Missionaire, I always
made a ton of money for Hubbard by running a really tough
communications course. People would come away from those
courses feeling as though they were on top of the world.
Their ability to communicate was greatly enhanced.
However, what they didn't realize was that their ability
to communicate with Scientologists was what was enhanced.
They came out of that course with dozens, hundreds, and
perhaps even thousands of new potential new "terminals" to
communicate with if the continued their involvement with
Scientology and proceeded up its "Bridge". Huge meetings,
called "Congresses", were held for the express purpose of
brining these new converts together in a "carnival"
atmosphere in order to cement the new reality promised
those traveling up the bridge of Scientology.
Conversely, initiates were being very subliminally led to
drop communications attempts with that not associated with
Scientology. Actuality was subliminally replaced by the
reality of Scientology's "Bridge to Total Freedom".
LEVEL FOUR - SERVICE FACSIMILES
Making others wrong in order to be right! This level
stuck you right in the middle of your real or imagined
past life guilt. Of course you had to be guilty of
something, or you couldn't possibly have degenerated as a
spirit to the lowly level of being stuck in a mere meat
body. Guilt, as a programming tool, works. There's not a
mother on this planet that doesn't instinctively know
that. Of course it doesn't work until a person has bonded
with another through, guess what? Affinity, reality and
communications. It is the fear of loss of those things
that allows guilt to be effectively used in controlling
the mindset of another human being.
Hubbard apparently never actually completed Level Four
himself. I believe it is safe to assume this is so, as
his organizations to this day continuously make others
wrong in order to create the appearance of Scientology
being right. If this behavior originated from "Source",
then "Source couldn't have been flat on level four. You
should be getting the hint as to where the rest of the
"Bridge is going. I sincerely hope to cover more of such
territory in subsequent writings
This is straight from the hip to all of you former staff
and parishioners. If the OT levels were really genuine
and attainable. Why would L. Ron Hubbard have used a
barely audited, quickie grade, level five person such as
myself, Fleet Captain material or not on over twenty
missions to create massive amounts of income for
Scientology and the Sea Org. Surely were OT's real, there
would have been one or two out of millions of Scientology
adherents Scientology had helped out of ruin, that could
have done the job better, faster, and with lasting
results. That Hubbard and his OT Flag aides had to use a
non-clear and an admitted un-flat OT III husband and wife
team is a direct conflict with the stated accomplishments
of Dianetic and Scientology processing.
Given the above information and the real definition of
states of clear and OT, it is important that you ask the
question that if there really were thousands of persons
clear and above, who possessed such abilities? Do you
really think that Scientology would have to spend millions
and millions of dollars of your hard earned money
annually, defending themselves from legal actions by
people who are really pissed off that they either didn't
get their ruin handled, or got nowhere near the abilities
gained that the old hidden data line still projects by
virtue of all of the old-timers continuing to falsely
attest to the attainment of the OT levels. Wouldn't it be
more likely that if such levels were attainable that the
fees for such services would be spent making Scientology
more readily affordable for the masses. How do you clear
a planet and save its souls by making the means to do it
beyond the means of 80% of the planets inhabitants.
Perhaps you put them to work for you in exchange for
services.
Matter, Energy, Space and Time (MEST) you know, the
non-theta stuff, non-spiritual? The stuff that all you
thetans are supposed to be outside? I cannot believe
people miss doing the upper levels treat BT's as building
blocks for the body. If you just remember Hubbard's
definition of Thetan you would realize that the body
cannot be made out of something non-physical. On OT III
we're auditing out body thetans? Degraded beings? I
think not!. Hubbard had you attacking your own DNA, your
very cells, or cells so distorted with induced electrical
current from the e-meter that they produced the effect of
an out-of-control "BT". You were, or have been trying to
audit away your own genetic entity line if you will. Is
it any wonder so many people spin out?
Infinitely expanding universes exist, and they are
observable phenomena with available technology. Such
phenomena presuppose the ability of all component parts
to experience the Is-ness of themselves. I have it on
good authority, from one of Hubbard's former Class XII
research auditors that Hubbard was fully aware that there
wasn't anything that wasn't alive, regardless of the state
of consciousness of its present form. Think about that
for a moment. Every cell of your body, billions of them,
have a consciousness of the role that they play in being
contained by the overall body in which you believe that
you dwell.
The most dangerous aspect of the Scientology programming
is I believe, the attack on your own actuality. You are
convinced that an integral part of your own beingness,
your link to the rest of life, DNA, are degraded beings
impinged on you, and in fact make up your body. Without
realizing it, you are attempting to blow off your own
body, and to add insult to injury you are paying
Scientology and the Hubbard-heads to do it. The fact of
the matter is that it is a form of suicide and they've
convinced you that it leads to total freedom. Get it,
everything thing that you as a synergetic physical entity
possess is supposed to be there. Your job, as a so-called
thetan, is to learn how to use it in a loving, synergetic
manner to create more joy in life between yourself and the
rest of all-that-is. I don't believe that the creator was
wrong, I just think that L. Ron Hubbard was a person who
could never be right unless he made every other living
human being wrong.
Thank you for your attention. I look forward to future
essays such as this being produced not only by myself, but
many others, as awareness of true spiritual enlightenment
unfolds through sharing of our individual truths.
The Captain
|